Saturday, January 31, 2009

Why did the punishment that the British meted out to the colonies for the Boston Tea Party please Sam Adams?

In the book Johnny Tremain by Esther Forbes, Sam Adams appears pleased by Britain’s response to the Boston Tea Party.


Although this might appear an unusual response, Sam Adams trusts that this British response will further unite the colonists against the British. Ultimately, he believes that Britain's actions will encourage the colonists’ support of fighting against the British. As Sam Adams reveals:



“I will work for war: the complete freedom of these colonies from any European power. We can have that freedom only by fighting for it.”



Also, as the text reveals:



“The punishment united the often jealous, often indifferent, separate colonies, as the Tea Party itself had not.”



Thus, Sam Adams wants the colonies to be free from all European powers, especially the British authority. Although he recognizes the horrors of war, he adamantly believes that the cost of war is worth the freedom of the colonies.


Consequently, Sam Adams accepts Britain's response to the Boston Tea Party. Although his feelings might appear extreme, other leaders (such as James Otis) seem to offer even more extreme viewpoints. Regardless, his viewpoint illustrates his value of freedom and independence from the British.

Friday, January 30, 2009

In the book Of Mice and Men, how is Curley's wife's nature most clearly revealed? What is one adjective used to describe this nature?

Curley’s wife is lonely.


There are many lonely characters in this story, but Curley’s wife is one of the saddest cases.  She wanders around looking for her husband, unable to make any friends on the ranch.  Steinbeck does not even give her a name, to accentuate her loneliness. 


Curley would not allow his wife to be friendly with any of the men on the ranch, because he is extremely jealous.  By the same token, the men on the ranch do not want to have anything to do with her because they are worried about how Curley would take it.



Slim said, "Well, you been askin' me too often. I'm gettin' God damn sick of it. If you can't look after your own God damn wife, what you expect me to do about it? You lay offa me." (Ch. 3)



Because she is still quite young, Curley’s wife desperately wants company.  She even tries to talk to Lennie, who is clearly slow, because she wants to talk to someone.  She tells Lennie about how a man told her she could be in movies.



"'Nother time I met a guy, an' he was in pitchers. Went out to the Riverside Dance Palace with him. He says he was gonna put me in the movies. Says I was a natural. Soon's he got back to Hollywood he was gonna write to me about it." (Ch. 5)



This sad scene tells us that Curley’s wife had dreams.  She wanted to make more of her life.  Unfortunately, she was condemned to a life of isolation and loneliness when she married Curley.  She became just a tramp that everyone was afraid to come into contact with.

Do all or most male mammals have nipples? Is male lactating common or rare? Do most mammals help to nurse their child?

In most mammalian cases, nipple-like structures seem to be the norm.  As always, it is never 100%, the exception to the rule here are the horse and the platypus.  In humans, we were female before we were male, the X chromosome being fertilized by the Y chromosome, and the existence of nipple-like structures are the norm.  On the subject of lactation, again, the majority sides with the female.  There is an example listed of Old World fruit bats, but even that is sketchy at best in terms of male lactation.  For a mammal to lactate, an abundance of the enzyme lactase needs to be present, which is what occurs upon mammalian live-birth.  Since this does not occur with males, the likelihood of male lactation is slim to none with humans.  To answer the last question, again, there is a low participation factor of both parents nursing, based on the dearth of male ability to lactate.  Nipples on the male side of mammalia appear to be for superficial ornamentation only, not much in terms of actual functionality.

What three personality traits of Jem Finch are revealed in Chapter 15 of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird?

Many of Jem's best personality traits are revealed in Chapter 15 of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird. One of the most important traits revealed is protectiveness. More specifically, he demonstrates devotion to protecting his own, such as his father. While demonstrating devotion to protect, he also demonstrates bravery and sheer stubbornness.

Jem very easily senses danger brewing when a crowd of men gather to talk to Atticus in the front lawn one evening. Though Atticus insists he was not being and would not be threatened by a mob, Jem continues to listen to his instincts telling him danger was near. Jem becomes so uneasy that, after Atticus leaves the house at a suspicious time and carrying a suspicious light bulb attached to an extension cord, Jem refuses to go to bed and instead dresses to leave the house as well, telling Scout, "Scout ... I'm scared. ... Scared about Atticus. Somebody might hurt him." After that, Jem, Scout, and Dill leave to go downtown to try and see what Atticus is up to.

Once Jem sees that a mob has approached Atticus as he guards the jail door and Scout makes her presence known, Jem displays an urgent desire to protect and a great deal of bravery by refusing to go home. Four times Atticus orders and begs Jem to go home, but all four times Jem refuses, which also shows his determination and stubbornness. Though Atticus had feared for the children's safety, after Scout saves the day with her naive friendly conversation with Walter Cunningham, Atticus expresses his appreciation of Jem's determination to protect, bravery, and stubbornness, as Scout describes in the following:



Atticus and Jem were well ahead of us, and I assumed that Atticus was giving him hell for not going home, but I was wrong. As they passed under a streetlight, Atticus reached out and massaged Jem's hair, his one gesture of affection. (Ch. 15)



Hence, in assertively striving to protect Atticus, Jem demonstrates he possesses the traits of protectiveness, bravery, and stubbornness, all traits he shares with his father, and all traits his father is very proud to learn Jem possesses.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

In The Giver by Lois Lowry, does Jonas feel bad about lying for the first time (when he lies to his parents)? Also, does he experience anything...

Jonas does not feel bad about lying to his parents, because he realizes that they cannot understand the concept of love.


Jonas is horrified when he receives his instructions and one of the rules says that he can lie.  Lying is expressly forbidden in his community, as far as he knows.



He had been trained since earliest childhood, since his earliest learning of language, never to lie. It was an integral part of the learning of precise speech. (Ch. 9)



Jonas wonders if anyone else had the same rule, and people have been lying to him all along.  He ponders the fact that if he were to ask someone if he or she was lying, he wouldn’t know if the person was telling the truth.  He can't imagine a situation where he would be the one lying. 


Jonas lies for the first time when he asks his parents whether they love him or not.  Love is not a construct that exists in the community, but Jonas learns about it through the memories.  It seems wonderful to him, and he misses the closeness that he experiences in the memories.  When he asks his parents if they love him, he does not get the result  he expected.  His father is amused, and chides him about precision of language.



"Your father means that you used a very generalized word, so meaningless that it's become almost obsolete," his mother explained carefully. (Ch. 16)



Jonas’s parents ask him if he understands, and he tells them that he does.  He has never lied to his parents before, but he doesn't feel bad about it.  He lied because they have no understanding of love, so they could never know how he feels.    Understanding that his parents do not love him, he tells Gabe that the world could be different.  Love is possible, in a community that allows it.


Jonas’s realization that love is a better way of life is an important one.  In lying to his parents, he separated himself from them.  This is the point where Jonas ceased to be a member of his community.  For him, the community is broken.  Its way of life is a tragedy.  Jonas seeks a connection with others.  This is why he told Gabe about the concept of love.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

What is division of labour? What are its advantages?

When we want to accomplish something, whether it be running a household, a restaurant or a manufacturing plant, all that we need to accomplish can be broken down into a series of separate tasks. When we divide those tasks so that people are performing the same tasks all the time, that is a division of labor.  There are powerful advantages to this. 


Division of labor creates expertise in each area of labor.  When people are doing the same thing over and over again, they get much better at it, as opposed to a situation in which people are doing a variety of tasks, hence the expression,"Jack of all trades, master at none."  In a traditional marriage, the division of labor was to cede all household matters to the wife and all external matters to the husband, which meant that wives became quite competent at running households, while men, left home alone, didn't seem to be up to the task. This division of labor has been substantially eroded over the years, since both males and females are expected to be responsible for everything. Thus, there has been a trade off, equality gained but a loss in the advantages of the division of labor. 


Division of labor creates great efficiency, a corollary of the expertise gained, and also, more attention paid to how tasks are set up in the first place, a means of moving a product along, for example, on an assembly line, so that as each task is completed, another can be performed by its "expert."  In a restaurant, cooking tasks are often divided, such that one person prepares salads, another desserts, and another entrees. In this situation, all can be working on their respective tasks at the same time, rather than having one person having to do all three far more slowly, costing the employer more money and time.  Even less efficient would be to have the cooks also waiting on the tables, since they are then not performing the tasks they can do the best and the most quickly. 


As the world moves away from the rural and the agricultural to the urban and industrial or post-industrial, division of labor becomes the norm, not the exception.  A farmer once did everything on the farm, from planting to milking the cows to selling produce at a roadside stand. Even farms are now "factories" run by major corporations, with clear and efficient divisions of labor on them.  The farmer who did everything could no longer make a living because of the inefficiency. I would hazard a guess that there are very few endeavors in today's world that do not involve some division of labor.  This is a shame, in a way, since there can be pleasure in knowing how to do a variety of tasks, and there are times when we really need to know how to do more than one kind of task, for example, when technology fails us.  

In J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye, how does Mr. Antolini help Holden with his journey in life?

Mr. Antolini is one of Holden's former teachers from Elkton Hills. Mr. Antolini had been to Holden's home for dinner many times, so the two know each other very well. This places Mr. Antolini in a position to help Holden understand what is going on in his life as he approaches adulthood. Further, Mr. Antolini must be held in high regard by Holden because he would rather stay at Antolini's house than tell his parents that he has recently gotten kicked out of Pencey. While there, Holden receives some of the best advice from someone who really cares for his future.


First, Mr. Antolini asks about Holden's current grades and discovers that he got kicked out of Pencey. Then he really makes an effort to give Holden some perspective on life. He knows that Holden doesn't like phonies and wants to live a noble life; so, he decides to write down a quote that he hopes will help Holden to understand what a noble life is.



"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of the mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one" (188).



This gives great perspective into how a person should behave in order to live nobly, rather than hoping to die for a noble cause. This pegs Holden correctly because he only sees the phonies in life and has a difficult time finding anything noble. Mr. Antolini gives more advice that shows he really knows Holden and what Holden is going through.



"Among other things, you'll find that you're not the first person who was ever confused and frightened and even sickened by human behavior. . . many men have been just as troubled morally and spiritually as you are right now" (189).



Holden doesn't say much about his reaction to all of this advice because he is desperately tired and wants to go to sleep. It's too bad Mr. Antolini ruins his relationship with Holden by stroking his hair after he falls asleep, but the advice was still good. Holden must have remembered the advice well because he writes it down afterwards while describing his adventures in the hospital in California.

What was Macbeth's tragic flaw?

Macbeth's major tragic flaw is his ambition, as he himself reveals in his soliloquy in Act I, Scene 7:



I have no spur
To prick the sides of my intent, but only
Vaulting ambition, which o'erleaps itself
And falls on the other—



It is Macbeth's ambition that causes him to kill the King, an act that leads to his downfall. But Macbeth is also very trusting and easily persuaded. It never dawns on him until the climactic final scene that the witches might be misleading him by telling him he is essentially invincible. They are telling him what he wants to hear, and he never really questions them--indeed, he bases all of his actions on their prophecies. Lady Macbeth also easily persuades her husband to carry out the murder of the king, even when he has, after careful consideration, decided to put it off for awhile. Macbeth, while a very powerful man, allows himself to be led by others. That these "others" were female would have suggested to Shakespeare's audiences a weakness of will that they would have seen as an inversion of the natural order.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

What do Bruno and Gretel see outside their window in Boyne's The Boy in the Striped Pajamas?

This question can be answered by reading Chapter Four:  "What They Saw Through the Window."  The short answer to your question is that Bruno and Gretel see the Jewish prisoners at Auschwitz.  Because the concentration camp is right across from the Commandant's house, the Commandant's two children are not protected from seeing the prisoners walking about behind the fence.  Bruno and Gretel are confused.



There were small boys and big boys, fathers and grandfathers and perhaps a few uncles too.  And some of those people who live on their own on everybody's road but don't seem to have any relatives at all.  They were everyone.



They see "a nasty type of place" with what they think might be "modern types of houses" found on what they can only believe to be "the countryside."  This is where Bruno gets the mistaken idea that the people behind the fence are farmers; however, Bruno wonders why there are no farm animals to be seen.  Further, the two of them decide they can see hundreds of people, but that there must be thousands behind the fence.  



And one final thought came into her brother's head as he watched the hundreds of people, ... all of them--were wearing the same clothes as each other:  a pair of grey striped pajamas with a grey striped cap on their heads.



This quotation, of course, is where the title comes from.  These "grey striped pajamas" are striking as the hundreds of people walk around inside the Auschwitz fence.  These are the people that Gretel and Bruno see outside their window.

Monday, January 26, 2009

In "The Cask of Amontillado," give an example of hyperbole used by the narrator in the beginning of the story.

The very first line of the story is an example of hyperbole, or overstatement.  The narrator, Montresor, says, "The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as best I could; but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge."  It is unlikely that Fortunato had actually injured Montresor a thousand times, and thus we can deduce that Montresor, the narrator, is exaggerating in order to make a point.  


It seems that Montresor is now an old man, confessing his sins on his deathbed, it is probable that he is trying to justify his behavior -- and the murder of Fortunato -- and really impress upon his listener how deserved such an action was.  Since the purpose of hyperbole is always to emphasize the truth by exaggerating the truth, he also seems to want to convey just how injured he truly felt.  Even if Fortunato had not hurt him a thousand times, it certainly felt that way to Montresor, and thus he felt compelled to act the way he did.

What was the main purpose of the French revolution?

When the French Revolution broke out in 1789, its main purpose was to address the financial problems of the regime. The numerous wars of the eighteenth century in which France was involved, e.g. the French and Indian War, had caused the government to spend more than it received in revenue. Over time, this deficit had turned into a significant debt which required immediate action.


Part of the problem lay in the French system of taxation. The clergy were exempt from paying taxes and King Louis's minister struggled to raise money from the nobles, so this financial burden fell to the people who had the least money - the merchants and the peasants. As the amount of tax increased, to try and appease France's economic problems, these people were stretched to their limits and consequently became very angry with the tax system. To make matters worse, a number of crop failures in the 1780s left many on the verge of starvation. 


The French Revolution, therefore, was sparked by financial problems and the immediate need to improve the economic well-being of the state. 

What role does Reese play in the family dynamics developed in Bastard Out of Carolina? How does her character's changing role affect her sister?

The character Reese shows the reader a slightly different reaction to the family history and circumstances than is seen from Bone. Although they grow up in the same environment, Reese has a different father. This adds to the competitive atmosphere of the girls as they grow up. They both experience prejudice towards their family and living situations, being called "trash" and other names by adults, as well as judgement from their peers, such as Shannon, with whom Bone has a very short-lived friendship. The reader may assume that Reese, as Bone, is being abused by Glen, as evidenced by both girls' displays of sexuality coinciding with violent fantasies. Reese's preoccupation with sexuality shows when she complains to Bone about Glen and their mother. This affects Bone strongly, because it is the first time she makes the connection between "sex" and her molestation by Glen.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

In "A Christmas Carol," explain how the theme of family is explored. Consider the importance of families.

The theme of family is seen in many ways throughout the story, including in both traditional families and non-traditional families.


  • The Cratchit family is the most prominent one in the story. This consists of Bob Cratchit, his wife, and their six children. They are a very close family. Although they do not have very much, it is obvious throughout the story that they are the ideal family, in the sense that they enjoy each other, love each other, and support each other. They are also very kind people, something we see the parents modeling and the children following.

  • Fred and his wife are Scrooge's only relatives and family. They live nearby and repeatedly try to get Scrooge to join them for Christmas dinner. Fred knows his uncle will turn him down, but he's determined to ask every year. This demonstrates again, a clear loyalty to family. Despite his uncle being intolerable, Fred extends an invitation to him to spend the holidays as a family. Fred and his wife appear to also be very happy and close to one another.

  • Ebenezer and Fan are siblings and we get to see how close they were through the Ghost of Christmas past journey. This is one of the few relationships in Scrooge's life where he was loving and affectionate and when we find out that she died later, we also find out that Scrooge was very sad about her passing. This relationship demonstrates he is capable of close familial relationships, but for whatever reason he has turned his back on them as he has gotten older.

  • Fezziwig and his employees share a very close relationship. We see this in the Ghost of Christmas Past journey as well. At the Christmas party that Fezziwig throws for his employees, he treats them like family. He is kind and caring, and treats everyone of equal value. This tells the reader that anyone can be treated like family - that we can make our own families - that family is a state of mind. So, even though Scrooge does not have many blood relatives still alive in the present, we see him add to his "family" by growing closer to the Cratchits.

  • Finally, we know at the end of A Christmas Carol that Scrooge becomes like an adopted father to Tiny Tim. His relationship with the Cratchits changes entirely and he is an unofficial member of their family. 

Friday, January 23, 2009

On what page did Montag call Faber in Fahrenheit 451?

Montag originally met Faber in the park one day. He struck up a conversation with him and quickly discovered that Faber had been an English professor who lost his job when the colleges began to close from a lack of students. Montag thought that he spoke in a very cadenced voice, which indicates a poetic command of language. Faber begins to slowly trust Montag over the course of their conversation and keeps putting his hand over his pocket. Montag realizes that Faber probably has a book in his pocket, but he doesn't arrest him or turn Faber in. Faber gives Montag his number: 



"For your file," he said, "in case you decide to be angry with me." "I'm not angry," Montag said, surprised. (71)



Montag has kept Faber's number in a file marked "FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS." He never turned it in or pursued it. The reader realizes at this point that Montag really has been collecting books for quite a while and that he has been unhappy for longer than he has known Clarisse. 



He dialed the call on a secondary phone. The phone on the far end of the line called Faber's name a dozen times before the professor answered in a faint voice. Montag identified himself and was met with a lengthy silence. "Yes, Mr. Montag?" (71)



Montag asks him a question regarding the number of Bibles remaining in the country, but Faber pretends not to understand him and hastily gets off the phone. After showing the Bible to Mildred again, Montag heads to Faber's house. 

Thursday, January 22, 2009

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what role does Aunt Alexandra represent in the modern world?

In the modern world Aunt Alexandria represents tradition and importance of family and women. To many of us she seems to be stuck in the past, but she also has a strong commitment to her family.  She wants the children to respect the trials and tribulations of the family's ancestors and to appreciate all they have because of them.


Aunt Alexandra can also be considered outdated and old fashioned.  By today's standards she puts too much emphasis on "being a lady." Yet after Scout observes how poised her aunt is at the church tea when they learn that Tom Robinson has been shot Scout declares that "if Aunty could be a lady at a time like this, so should I."


Aunt Alexandra represents strength and the importance that women play in our modern society.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

What power enables the Mariner to stop the wedding guest in his tracks?

The mariner has a supernatural power which enables him to recognize a man who will benefit from his tale and who therefore can be stopped and held in a sort of spell while he listens. The mariner also states that he has acquired a strange power of speech as a result of the experiences which he recounts in his tale.



I pass, like night, from land to land;
I have strange power of speech;
That moment that his face I see,
I know the man that must hear me:
To him my tale I teach.



The mariner is still expiating his sin for killing the albatross. The supernatural entity, i.e., God, who imposed the penance also gave the mariner the two powers--the power of speech and the power to recognize the individuals who would listen to his long tale and learn from it. 


Coleridge had to invent these supernatural powers for his story-teller in order to make it plausible that the wedding guest could be compelled to listen to such a long tale, especially when he is next of kin to the bridegroom and has an important part to play in the wedding ceremony. The wedding guest's strong motivation to get to the wedding creates a conflict with the mariner's determination to tell his story to this one man rather than to any other person. This conflict is intended to provide some drama to the mariner's tale. In the end the mariner has won. He has succeeded in holding the wedding guest in his spell until he has finished his whole tale and added the moral.



He prayeth best, who loveth best
All things both great and small;
For the dear God who loveth us,
He made and loveth all.



The wedding guest turns away from the bridegroom's door. It is too late for him to make an appearance, and the mariner's tale has made such a strong impression on him that he can no longer take an interest in such mundane things as wedding ceremonies and wedding feasts.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

How did the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century lead to the scramble for Africa?

The Industrial Revolution contributed to the "Scramble for Africa," as well as imperialism more broadly, in several different ways. 


First, the Industrial Revolution created an almost insatiable demand for raw materials, including metals, timber, rubber, and many others. Africa is rich in these materials, and European nations, and the industrialists who helped influence foreign policy, clamored for them. In the Congo, for instance, King Leopold of Belgium created his own company to profit from the harvest of rubber and other raw materials. His company treated the natives with shocking brutality that came to represent the worst of European colonialism. 


Second, the Industrial Revolution created a demand for new, secure markets for manufactured goods. Colonization created captive markets in places like Africa, and this helped to fuel the competition for colonies. Many Europeans feared that a lack of new markets would result in overproduction, which in turn would lead to economic depression. This gave urgency to the colonization project. 


Finally, the Industrial Revolution exacerbated the technological gap between the peoples of Africa and Asia and people in Europe. This was probably the single most important factor in facilitating the "Scramble for Africa." Europeans, armed with machine guns and other advanced weapons, were able to conquer African peoples. 

Sunday, January 18, 2009

How does Huck feel about Jim's decision to wait for a doctor?

In this last episode of the novel, Tom is shot in the leg trying to get the mob of farmers coming to get Jim from the shack to chase him instead of Huck and Jim.  When Huck and Jim find Tom, Jim tells Huck to go get a doctor, and he will stay with Tom.  Huck is surprised by Jim’s kindness because instead of continuing to run, Jim puts his freedom at risk to save Tom.  It is at this point that Huck says that he knows Jim is “white inside.”  The word, “white,” has a different meaning here and is not about race.  The color white is a symbol of purity, innocence, and goodness.  Huck realizes once again that Jim is a compassionate person who firmly believes in doing the right thing.  As Jim shows throughout the novel to Huck, he is a father figure who will not abandon a child when he needs him even though it may have terrible consequences for himself.  

Why do the men wear oxygen helmets in "A Sound of Thunder"?

The men wear oxygen helmets so that they do not introduce modern germs into the ancient air.


When the men visit the past with Time Safari, Inc., they have to be very careful not to affect the environment in any way.  Even the smallest change could have a drastic effect on the prehistoric ecosystem.  This is why they carefully place a path to walk on and only shoot animals that are just about to die.  This is explained to Eckels, the hunter.



"We don't want to change the Future. We don't belong here in the Past. … A Time Machine is finicky business. Not knowing it, we might kill an important animal, a small bird, a roach, a flower even, thus destroying an important link in a growing species." 



Proof of this occurs when Eckels accidentally steps on the butterfly.  Seeing the dinosaur scares him, and he chokes.  He isn’t even able to kill it himself.  Travis makes him collect the bullets.  They can't leave anything behind.


As they are leaving, Eckels is so out of sorts from the experience that he accidentally steps off the path and kills a butterfly.  When they return to the future, it is clearly a different future.  The sign’s spelling is different and the wrong man was elected president.  He looks at it in disbelief.



It fell to the floor, an exquisite thing, a small thing that could upset balances and knock down a line of small dominoes and then big dominoes and then gigantic dominoes, all down the years across Time. Eckels' mind whirled. It couldn't change things. Killing one butterfly couldn't be that important! Could it?



Travis murders Eckels in retribution, but the damage is done.  If killing one tiny butterfly caused all of that change, can you imagine what several minutes of breathing into the air would have done?  When you breathe out, you breath out germs that your ecosystem is used to.  The age of the dinosaur would not have had the same germs.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

What are some of Jem's character traits in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird?

Jem has many character traits throughout the novel To Kill a Mockingbird. One of Jem's character traits is his bossy attitude toward Scout and Dill. Jem is continually giving Scout and Dill directives during their playtime, and he constantly tells his younger sister what to do. Scout reacts with physical aggression over Jem's "maddening superiority." Jem is also a "know-it-all." Jem is always telling Scout random facts, even if they are wrong. Scout mentions that her brother informs her of basically "everything" he learns. Jem claims to have extensive knowledge about the neighbors, sports, relationships, history, and the justice system.


Another character trait of Jem is that of a dreamer. There are several scenes throughout the novel that depict Jem looking intensely at football magazines. Jem's dream is to become an all-star football player when he grows up. Jem is also a loyal son and brother. Jem refuses to leave his father's side when the Old Sarum bunch surrounds him at the jailhouse, and defends his sister during Bob Ewell's attack. He is also obedient. Jem takes pride in the fact that his father has never beaten him, which demonstrates his obedience. Jem is caring throughout the novel and comforts Scout when she becomes upset. Jem consoles Scout after Aunt Alexandra tells her she isn't allowed to play with Walter Cunningham and attempts to cheer her up following the pageant.

What state of matter has low energy, a fixed volume and strong bonds?

All three of these characteristics describe the solid state of matter. Of the three states of matter, solid, liquid and gas, the solid state has the lowest average kinetic energy. Particles in the solid state have only vibrational motion while particles are free to move around in the liquid and gas states.


Solid substances also have a fixed volume, meaning that they aren't compressible. (Liquids also have a fixed volume but don't meet the other criteria.)


The characteristic of having strong bonds requires some clarification:


Ionic solids are held together by strong forces of attraction between oppositely charged particles. These attractions are called ionic bonds. When ionic compounds are heated to high temperatures the ionic bonds are broken and melting occurs.


Molecular solids consist of molecules held together by intermolecular attractions. They melt when enough energy is absorbed to overcome attractions between molecules. The covalent bonds between atoms within a molecule aren't broken during phase changes. Covalent bonds are strong chemical bonds that are present in all three phases of a substance. 


It's more accurate to say that substances in the solid state have strong attractions between particles, unless you're referring specifically to ionic solids.

Friday, January 16, 2009

In Animal Farm, what are the similarities and differences between Snowball and Napoleon's beliefs?

In the opening chapters of Animal Farm, Snowball and Napoleon share the common belief in overthrowing Mr Jones and taking control of Manor Farm for the good of the animals. Together, for example, the pigs develop a social system called Animalism which emphasises the equality and freedom of animals and frees them from the exploitation of Man. 


But it is Snowball and Napoleon's differences which are most prominent throughout the rest of the novel. We see lots of examples of this after the revolution takes place and the humans are driven off Manor Farm. On the subject of clothes, for example, Snowball throws some ribbons on to the fire because he believes that they are the "mark of a human being." He states that animals should never wear clothes and should always be naked. This contrasts sharply with Napoleon, who wears human clothes later in the novel. For Napoleon, then, clothes are a symbol of his power and dominance and he is proud to wear them. 


Similarly, after the revolution, Snowball believes that the animals should continue to work hard on the farm to ensure its smooth running. For him, it is a "point of honour" to work harder and more efficiently than the humans. In contrast, Napoleon does not value work in the same way and he uses this opportunity to steal the milk.


Snowball also believes in forming committees to improve the lives of the animals. While many of these efforts are failures, his reading and writing initiative is a "great success." But Napoleon believes that the "education of the young" is far more important. He does not participate in any of these committees and he instead takes Jessie and Bluebell's puppies on the (false) pretence that he is educating them privately. In reality, Napoleon is training the puppies to become his own personal guard dogs and does not value education at all. 


Finally, we see the differences in Napoleon and Snowball's beliefs at their strongest when it comes to the building of the windmill in Chapter Five. Snowball believes in the value of the windmill because of its labour-saving potential. He also believes that it can greatly enhance the comfort of the animals by giving them heating and lighting in the barn. Napoleon, however, feels very differently about the windmill. For him, the windmill is a waste of time which detracts from the animals' most important mission: boosting food production to prevent starvation. But when Napoleon loses the windmill debate, he reacts with unprecedented cruelty by setting his dogs on Snowball. What this incident really shows is that Snowball and Napoleon differ on the most fundamental level: Snowball is concerned with the welfare and equality of all animals, while Napoleon is only interested in the pursuit of personal power.

Analyze the impacts of industrialization on societies.

This is an extremely broad question, one which is really impossible to answer in any degree of detail in a limited space. The effects of industrialization on societies have been profound, indeed the Industrial Revolution, it can be argued, is among the most important developments in human history. Here are just a few of the changes brought about by the development of industry:


  • The emergence of a large working class that did not own the means of production in their industry. So, for example, rather than small skilled weavers who owned their own looms, industrialists employed less-skilled workers who worked in mills on machine looms.

  • The rise of new cities (and growth of old ones) as people moved to urban areas in search of industrial jobs. In Great Britain, cities like Manchester arose from almost nothing to become massive cities full of working class people and the factories where they toiled.

  • The consolidation of industry into large corporations and trusts. This was a result of the fact that the new technologies that drove the Industrial Revolution were capital-intensive, that is, they required a great deal of money to support. So large businesses were at an advantage, and monopolies resulted.

  • The growth of a new class of wealthy industrialists and financiers. These leaders of major industries exercised almost unprecedented control over business and industry.

  • Working conditions for many workers declined. In the absence of government regulation, hours were very long, conditions very dangerous, and child labor was rampant. Many in the new working class mentioned above lived on subsistence wages. 

These are just a few of the changes that emerged as a result of the Industrial Revolution.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Does "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" recount a single dramatic, often tragic, episode?

This question is another way of asking, "Does this poem qualify as a ballad?" The answer is "yes," but let's examine each of the three qualifications contained in this definition of a ballad.


Does the poem recount a single episode? In a sense, the poem functions as a "story within a story" or a frame story because it relates one story about the mariner pulling aside a wedding guest, which happens in the present time, and another story about what happened to the mariner at sea, told in flashback. However, the stories are not two separate tales; indeed, the present time story is an outgrowth of the prior story and is really just a continuation of it. Because of the mariner's experience at sea, he is now compelled to roam the earth retelling his tale to people who need to hear it. So although part of the story is told in flashback, the poem has no subplots or secondary plots; it relates a single episode.


Second, is it dramatic? This word has two definitions, and both apply. One refers to the art of drama, where there are actors in a play who enact a series of events. This definition applies in the sense that the poem is a story with rising action, climax, and denouement and features memorable characters. The second definition for "dramatic" is "striking." The events in the poem are certainly striking. The poem features spirits, battles with nature, life-threatening situations, and even "zombies." 


Third, are the events "often tragic?" This can also be answered affirmatively. Some of the tragedies that occur in the poem are that 200 sailors die, two spirits--Death and Life-in-Death--gamble for the life of the mariner, a young boy goes insane, and the mariner himself does rigorous penance for causing what the poem presents as a grave tragedy itself: the killing of the innocent albatross. 


This poem easily conforms to the definition of a ballad by presenting a single dramatic and tragic story. 

An adult female who weighs 164 pounds consumes on average 3040 Cal/day. If she wanted to lose 20.0 pounds in 257 days, what should her daily...

There are two ways to lose weight. You either have to decrease the input of calories coming from food, or increase the output of calories coming from exercise. If the amount of calorie input (food) is less than the amount of calorie output (basal metabolic rate + exercise), then a calorie deficit leads to weight loss Your question asked about how best to decrease this woman’s calorie input to achieve weight loss. However, it’s important to remember that weight can also be lost by increasing calorie output through exercise!


Figuring out calorie deficit per day:


The first thing you will need to think about is how large this woman’s calorie deficit will need to be each day to achieve the loss of 20 lbs. over 257 days. A pound is roughly equal to 3,500 kcal, meaning that a calorie surplus of 3500 kcal will lead to a pound of weight gain and a calorie deficit of 3500 kcal will lead to a pound of weight loss.


20 lbs. is equal to 70,000 calories. Knowing that this woman will need to create a 70,000 kcal deficit over 257 days, how much of a calorie deficit will she need each day?


Figuring out energy expenditure (basal metabolic rate + exercise):


The next thing you will need to figure out is this woman’s daily energy expenditure. This you can find by adding her basal metabolic rate (BMR) with her calories burned through activity (exercise).


A basal metabolic rate simply means the amount of calories she burns per day just from the chemical work of sustaining life! In other words, it is the minimum amount of calories burned per day at rest, or the number of calories you would still burn if you were completely bedridden.


A basal metabolic rate can be roughly estimated by this formula: 655 + (4.35 x weight in pounds) + (4.7 x height in inches) – (4.7 x age in years). Since we don’t have most of this information, we will not be able to get a particularly accurate estimate of her BMR.


This problem also didn’t give us this women’s daily calories burned through activity. Normally, we would add this together with her BMR to find her total daily energy expenditure. Since we are at such a loss for information, let’s go with a very rough estimate of 2,000 kcalfor energy expenditure—a fairly typical number for non-athletes.



Decreasing calorie input to create a calorie deficit:


This woman will need to create a calorie deficit of 272 kcal per day to hit her weight loss goal (70,000 kcal/257 days). How many calories per day will she need to limit herself to assuming her daily energy expenditure is 2,000 kcal?


(Hint: take the daily calorie deficit and subtract it from her daily energy expenditure)

Marisol is painting on a piece of canvas that has an area of 180 square inches. The length of the painting is 1 1/4 times the width. What are the...

We are given a rectangular canvas with area 180 square inches with a length 5/4 as long as the width and we are asked to find the dimensions:


Area = length times width, so we let w=width in inches and l=5/4w=length in inches.


Then





Since the width must be positive, w=12.


Then


The dimensions are 12" by 15"


Check: 12x15=180 as required.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what does Scout say she heard the day she landed near Radley's steps?

In Chapter 4, things turn awry when Jem pushes Scout too hard as she rolls along in an old tire. Scout ends up being dumped out onto the steps at the Radley Place after she comes to a stop.


Meanwhile, Jem yells at his sister to get up and to run away. However, Scout is still dazed due to her stint in the rolling tire, and she struggles to regain her equilibrium. When she manages to become conscious of her surroundings, Scout takes off running. In all her efforts to get away, she leaves the old tire behind, and Jem, to his consternation, has to retrieve it. Later, at the end of the chapter, Scout reveals why she doesn't want to continue playing games which incorporate impersonating the Radleys in some form: she had heard laughter coming from the Radley house on the day she fell out onto the steps at the Radley place. To Scout, Boo Radley is more real than Jem realizes.

Sketch the region enclosed by the given curves and find its area.

You need to determine first the points of intersection between curves and , by solving the equation, such that:



Factoring out x yields:



Hence, the endpoints of integral are x = 0 and x = 4.


You need to decide what curve is greater than the other on the interval [0,4]. You need to notice that on the interval [0,4], hence, you may evaluate the area of the region enclosed by the given curves, such that:


, where for








Hence, evaluating the area of the region enclosed by the given curves, yields



The area of the region enclosed by the given curves is found between the red and black curves, for

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

When you create a primary cell, why is it that a noble and a unnoble metal generate more electricity in a electrolyte with a lower concentration of...

Electrical current is the flow of electrons within an electrical circuit.  In the conditions you have described, remember electrons have a negative charge, while hydrogen ions have a positive charge.  In the first example, the unnoble metal would have electrons to donate to the electrical current, so it would be necessary to have an electrolyte with low hydrogen ions.  Otherwise, the electrons would not complete the electrical circuit and chemically bond with the hydrogen ions, producing hydrogen atoms.  In the second set of conditions, the overabundance of hydrogen ions in the electrolyte would tend to strip electrons from the outer energy level of the two noble metals, causing an imbalance to occur.  Electrical current has a tendency to flow from high potential to low potential, so if a high potential were created on the noble metal that was less electronegative, this imbalance could be created.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

In Hamlet, why has there been so much military activity lately in Denmark?

Shakespeare's reason for including all the military activity in his play is complicated. It has to to with King Hamlet's ghost. Shakespeare wanted to have the Ghost come to Elsinore to tell Hamlet that he was murdered by his brother and Hamlet's uncle, Claudius, and to get young Hamlet to pledge himself to take revenge. Shakespeare wanted to establish that the actor playing the Ghost was indeed a ghost and that he looked like the dead King Hamlet; and the playwright wanted to do this before the Ghost and Hamlet got together in Scenes 4 and 5 of Act 1.


But how could he make the audience understand that the actor playing the Ghost was a ghost and not just another character in the play? He did not want the Ghost to be wearing a shroud, and he did not have a way of making the actor look luminiscent. Even if he could make the actor luminescent, it would not be effective with the play being presented in daylight. So Shakespeare decided to make the actor look "different" by having him wear armor with a helmet. He would have instructed the actor to walk in a "ghostlike" manner, which would probably mean stalking slowly, looking straight ahead, and ignoring the three men observing him--Horatio, Marcellus, and Bernardo. These actors would tell each other, and at the same time tell the audience, that this was obviously a ghost and that he looked exactly like the dead King Hamlet. The Ghost would probably move silently because he would be wearing felt slippers, whereas when the other actors walked they would make the usual clumping on the boards.


But Shakespeare did not want anyone in his audience to suspect that the Ghost was there to talk to his son. He wanted the Ghost's message to come as a great surprise in Scene 5, when the Ghost and Hamlet were alone. So the playwright invented spurious reasons for the Ghost's presence in order to mislead the audience. Mainly, Shakespeare wanted to make the audience think that the Ghost was concerned about a possible war with Norway, which would explain why the actor was wearing armor. But Shakespeare invented a number of other reasons why the Ghost might have appeared at this time. These reasons are contained in the questions Horatio asks after he is urged to speak to the Ghost.



Stay illusion!
If thou hast any sound, or use of voice,
Speak to me;
If there be any good thing to be done,
That may to thee do ease and grace to me,
Speak to me;
If thou art privy to thy country's fate,
Which, happily, foreknowing may avoid,
O, speak!
Or if thou hast uphoarded in thy life
Extorted treasure in the womb of earth,
For which, they say, you spirits oft walk in death,
Speak of it! stay, and speak!



Horatio offers every conceivable reason for the Ghost's visit except the real one. Shakespeare wants to establish that Horatio, Marcellus, and Bernardo do not suspect the real reason for the Ghost's visit either.


Shakespeare had to invent a military problem as part of his way of misleading the audience. It turns out to be a false alarm. Claudius complains to the Norwegian king about Fortinbras' threatening movements, the Norwegian king orders Fortinbras to cease and desist, and the whole problem is revolved by Act 2, Scene 2. Voltimand, one of the ambassadors to Norway, tells Claudius:



Most fair return of greetings and desires.
Upon our first, he sent out to suppress
His nephew's levies; which to him appear'd
To be a preparation 'gainst the Polack,
But better look'd into, he truly found
It was against your Highness; whereat griev'd,
That so his sickness, age, and impotence
Was falsely borne in hand, sends out arrests
On Fortinbras; which he, in brief, obeys,
Receives rebuke from Norway, and, in fine,
Makes vow before his uncle never more
To give the assay of arms against your Majesty.
Whereon old Norway, overcome with joy,
Gives him three thousand crowns in annual fee
And his commission to employ those soldiers,
So levied as before, against the Polack;
With an entreaty, herein further shown,
That it might please you to give quiet pass
Through your dominions for this enterprise,
On such regards of safety and allowance
As therein are set down.



So the whole war scare was a false alarm, a red herring, a tempest in a teapot. Obviously the military threat was invented to mislead the audience about the Ghost's presence. It also explains why the Ghost is wearing armor, but the armor is intended to make the actor recognizable as the ghost of Hamlet's father whenever he appears. Shakespeare is successful in diverting and misleading the audience. The Ghost's message comes as a total surprise and shock when Hamlet hears it in Scene 5 of Act 1.


Since Shakespeare has introduced Fortinbras and his army, albeit it entirely offstage, he decided to keep their presence in Denmark as a sort of subplot. In the end Fortinbras talks about claiming the Danish throne, and the dying Hamlet nominates him for that title. All this may be intended to show that the big war scare in Act 1 had some little substance to it.

What problems did John Adams face during his presidency?

John Adams faced several problems while he was president. For the first time, we had political parties in an election. Thus, while Adams won, he had political opposition. In fact, his Vice President, Thomas Jefferson, was from the political party opposed to Adam’s political party. Adams represented the Federalist Party while Jefferson represented the Democratic-Republican Party.


We had issues with France. The French were seizing our ships and interfering with our right to trade. When we sent representatives to France to discuss this, the French wouldn’t meet with them for several weeks. When they eventually met our representatives, they demanded a loan and a bribe. Americans were outraged at this treatment, in what became known as the XYZ Affair. They wanted Adams to go to war. Adams knew going to war was not in our best interests, so even though it hurt him politically, he used diplomacy to end the crisis.


At home, the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts hurt President Adams. The Sedition Act made it illegal to criticize the government. That conflicted with our right to free speech. The Alien Act made it harder for an immigrant to become a citizen by lengthening the waiting period from five to fourteen years before a foreigner could become a citizen. It also made it easier to deport an immigrant. The Alien Act was clearly aimed at hurting the Democratic-Republican Party since many immigrants were joining that party. The passage of this law helped to make Adams and his party unpopular.


Partially as a result of the growing unhappiness with President Adams and the Federalists, the Democratic-Republicans won the election of 1800.

The tendency of moving object to continue moving in a straight line or a stationary object to remain in place is called __________________.

The tendency of a moving object to continue moving in a straight line or a stationary object to remain in its place is called inertia.


In other words, inertia is the resistance of a physical object to a change in the object’s motion. A change to the object’s motion may include a change in the object’s speed or direction.


This correlates to Newton’s first law of motion that states “an object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force." Prior to Newton, it was believed that a moving object would eventually stop moving. Also before Newton, it was thought that a force was required to keep a moving object from stopping.

Saturday, January 10, 2009

What was the most important effect of WWII on American cultural life?

World War II had many major impacts on American culture.  The most drastic impact was that it helped foster a spirit of unity and patriotism.  


The United States entered World War II in December of 1941.  The war had already been raging on for over two years at this point.  Political leaders, such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt, encouraged Americans to unify together for one common goal: winning the war and defeating the Axis powers.  Propaganda, such as pamphlets and posters, implored Americans to sacrifice to help support the troops overseas.  Even many American films in the early 1940s featured noble women who worked hard while their men were overseas and heroic men who served as soldiers.  Thousands of young men voluntarily enlisted in the military.  Americans were encouraged to collect scrap metal, eat less of certain foods, and reuse what they had in order to support the war effort.  Patriotism increased during this time.

Friday, January 9, 2009

What is an analysis of this poem and what does the poet mean to express by it?

"The Snow Man" is one of Stevens' best-known poems and one his most talked about. Though the poem is short, it is powerful and provocative. The poem's last stanza is a strong statement that seems almost existential in its imagery, question the nature of existence:


For the listener, who listens in the snow, 


And, nothing himself, beholds 


Nothing that is not there and the nothing that is.



The poem describes a snow man that presumably the speaker is looking at, but also is comparing a human being with qualities of a snow man: with a "mind of winter" who has "been cold a long time." At the end, we see that the snow man is "nothing" but is also a listener; and because he is nothing he can see everything, i.e. "beholds nothing that is not there." He also can contemplate the emptiness of existence, i.e. "the nothing that is." The final line's parallel construction and rhythm also suggests that the world is at once full and empty, and that we can perceive everything, or nothing, as we choose. But this dual way of seeing and hearing seems to be what the snowman naturally embodies, and the speaker contemplates this.



"The Snow Man" been called "the best short poem in the English language" and its simple structure and word choices allow the rhythms to stand out. The word "and" repeats in ways that continue an idea that could easily have ended with the previous word, encouraging the reader to consider the words more carefully, to comprehend what has just been read before moving on.

Identify the appropriate steps in the communication process.

The communication process is a cyclical process continually repeating until any of the steps in the process degrades to the point of destroying the communication link. To categorize the appropriate step in the process it is best to start with identifying the steps leading up to the current situation.


There are five steps to the communication process.



Creation is the first step. The creator must determine the message and the optimal method for transmitting the message to the desired recipient.


Transmission is distributing the created message to the recipient usually in writing or orally. Artistic transmission of ideas is one of the cornerstones of the art culture.


Reception changes the onus of communication from the creator to the recipient. The recipient must obtain the message.


Translation is the step where the recipient decodes the content and categorizes the information received into useful data.


Response is the final step of the process and sets off the beginning of the next communication process. Responses fall into two categories. They may be simple acknowledgements of the communications (true response). It can also be a decision to continue the communication process, thus beginning the cycle again (cyclic response).

Mr. Algazi, from the supplied example, has demonstrated a response in the communication cycle. His response has triggered a new message which the client must now receive and translate to continue meaningful dialogue. The question can have more than one correct answer (there are at least three), but based on the phrasing of the question I believe Mr. Algazi is in the response step.


(Going a little further with the idea, Mr. Algazi is also in the process of transmitting a new message to the client. The client now has the onus of receiving the communication.)

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Although the proportions change among historians, it is generally agreed that the American colonists were profoundly divided in their support of...

At the outset of the American Revolution, Loyalists and Patriots both had compelling reasons for their beliefs. Loyalists believed that they were part of the British Empire and that remaining part of this empire was their duty as British citizens. In a similar vein, they believed that they were responsible for paying for the French and Indian War (or Seven Years' War) that had ended in 1763. The debts stemming from this war were part of the reason that Britain had decided to re-enforce the Navigation Acts that controlled trade between Britain and the colonies (after many years of not enforcing these acts). In addition, the British crown decided to tax the colonies to pay for the war. After all, the Loyalists argued, the war had been intended to help British colonists by dislodging the French from lands east of the Appalachian Mountains.


In addition, the Loyalists argued, they had representation in the British Parliament in the way all British citizens did. While they weren't represented directly in the Parliament, the system of British representation did not allow for this direct kind of representation. In this sense, the colonists were similar to all other British citizens. Perhaps most importantly, cultural ties kept some colonists loyal to Britain. They were British, and many were members of the Church of England.


The Patriots had political and economic arguments to support the idea that they should break away from England. Much of their reasoning came from the Enlightenment and the idea of the social contract, written about by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and others. The idea of the social contract is that the government must represent the needs of the governed and that people have certain inalienable or natural rights, referring to rights that are inborn and cannot be taken away. Many Patriots believed that the colonists deserved direct representation in Parliament. In addition, many of their colonial legislatures had become quite powerful, and they were used to this level of representation in government.


The Patriots also had commercial arguments. The Proclamation of 1763, issued by the British king, had prevented the colonists' movement roughly beyond the area west of the Appalachian Mountains after the French and Indian War, and many colonists wanted to expand west for new economic opportunities (many Patriots also saw the Proclamation of 1763 as curtailing their political rights). Patriots were also opposed to re-enforcement of the Navigation Acts, which said that trade between the colonies and Britain had to be carried on British ships. They protested against other forms of taxation and British power, including such acts as the Stamp Act (later repealed) and other acts, such as the Declaratory Act (which said the British Parliament could make laws that the colonies had to follow) and Quartering Act (which required colonists to provide accommodations for British soldiers). These acts, they thought, stymied colonial business and were also forms of the British king overreaching in the exercise of his rights. As the events before the Revolution unfolded, the colonists were angered by the British responses, such as the Boston Massacre of 1770, in which British soldiers killed several colonists in a fight. This event angered the colonists. 


No matter which side a person takes, he or she should carefully consider the arguments of the other side. It was likely a difficult choice to make and one that had cultural, political, and economic arguments behind it. 

What was the importance of omens and prophecy in 11th-century Scotland?

Certainly, people living in the 11th century in Scotland would have believed in prophecies and omens.  This is why, in the play, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are so willing to believe the Weird Sisters' statements.  However, many people living during Shakespeare's time would have been somewhat less willing to believe in prophecies and omens, and so Banquo would appear to be a much more modern character to Shakespeare's audience that the Macbeths.  


Further, the omens that the Old Man and Ross discuss in Act 2, Scene 4, would be quite believable to Scots living in the 1000s.  The Old Man talks about "A falcon, tow'ring in her pride of place, / [who] Was by a mousing owl hawked at and killed" (2.4.15-16).  In other words, an owl (a bird associated with witchcraft) has attacked and killed a much stronger and more powerful falcon (a bird associated with royalty).  Such a sight would have been terribly notable for them.  Moreover, Ross mentions the fact that "Duncan's horses" rebelled and the Old Man says that "they eat each / other" (2.4.23-24).  This unnatural occurrence appears would likely be read as symbolic of those who were formerly loyal to Duncan turning on one another.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Why does Atticus take his jacket off during the trial?

This was a calculated move by Atticus to appeal to the members of the jury. He, and all of the other professionals in the room, have been in suit and tie throughout the trial. Despite the stifling summer heat, they have remained buttoned up and proper. By removing his coat and unbuttoning his shirt and vest, Atticus becomes just like any of the jurors sitting in that jury box.



"His voice had lost its aridity, its detachment, and he was talking to the jury as if they were folks on the post office corner" (Ch. 20).



His actions personalize him again. He is not, perhaps, Tom Robinson's attorney so much as he is now Atticus Finch, friend and neighbor. He is not talking above them and trying to teach them something; he is talking with them. He is engaging them at their level.


There is a risk in him behaving this way. The jury could view him as being too casual about the case and even unprofessional. However, his reputation is good enough that we know that is probably not going to be the way they view this, so it is a calculated risk worth taking.

On what simple ironical reversal is the plot of the story based?

The basic irony of the story is that the hunter is hunted.  The irony is even starker, because Rainsford is a world-renowned hunter.  No one would think that he would be hunted.  In addition, in the beginning of the story, Rainsford says to his friend, Whitney, that there are two classes in the world - the hunter and the hunted.  Then Rainsford says jokingly to Whitney that they are lucky because they are hunters. 


When Rainsford finds himself on the island and falls prey to Zaroff's game, he becomes the hunted.  Rainsford, the hunter, now is running for this life.  Like an animal, he hides, evades, and fears pain and death.  He even says that he knows what an animals feels.  The text says:



Rainsford knew now how an animal at bay feels.




In light of these points, the whole short story is based on an ironic reversal. 

What is a summary of chapter 1 of "The Vendor of Sweets?"

In Chapter One, we learn that Jagan is a very religious man who offers prayers to Lakshmi every morning. He lives by the adage "Conquer taste, and you will have conquered the self.' When Jagan's cousin questions his faith in the maxim, Jagan merely states that he is only following the advice of sages.


Jagan proudly announces to his cousin that he has just given up salt that very morning. In fact, he proclaims that one 'must eat only natural salt.' Balding, bespectacled and aging, Jagan is fifty-five years old and an enthusiastic follower of Gandhi. He fancies himself living closely by all the precepts taught by the great teacher and Indian philosopher.


Jagan's ascetic lifestyle extends even to the realm of footwear; he will only wear leather sandals made from dying cows, asserting that no living animal should 'have its throat cut for the comfort' of his feet. However, Jagan maintains that his leather tanning activities often created turmoil in his household when his wife was alive; she had never become accustomed to the dreadful smell of the tanning leather.


Even as his cousin goads him, Jagan proudly boasts that he has also discarded sugar from his diet, preferring to ingest honey instead. As for meals, he has given up rice and relies on a little stone-ground wheat, honey, and greens to sustain him. It is obvious at this point that Jagan's cousin enjoys mocking his hypocrisy; after all, Jagan is a vendor of sweets. While he eschews every indulgence in his diet, Jagan is financially sustained by the sugar-loving habits of his customers.


Soon, Jagan's cousin leaves at the counting hour. During this all-important time, Jagan presides like a monarch over the day's earnings and counts up his profits. As the leftover trays are brought in from the front stall, Jagan's kitchen staff approach him to account for the day's business and to discuss what should be done with leftover sweets.


Jagan runs his business as strictly as he lives his austere life; he never permits his cooks to be idle for long. Business is an all-consuming passion for Jagan, and he will make his profits as long as the day lasts. As the chapter ends, we find that Jagan often appropriates a small portion of the day's proceeds for his own. To him, this small sum represents 'an immaculate conception, self-generated, arising out of itself and entitled to survive without reference to any tax.' The day ends when Jagan has finished counting his cash and dismissed the watchman, an ex-Army captain.

"The Open Window" is a combination of humor and irony. Explain how the writer Saki has used irony in this lesson to bring out the desired effect.

There is one great irony in the story. Framton Nuttel has come to the English countryside seeking peace and quiet for his "nerve cure." Instead he runs into a situation that brings about the very opposite of what he is seeking.


When he first meets Mrs. Sappleton he tells her why he has come to her part of England.



     "The doctors agree in ordering me complete rest, an absence of mental excitement, and avoidance of anything in the nature of violent physical exercise," announced Framton...



Vera has already had the opportunity to tell Framton her story about the three men who have been dead for three years, having been sucked into a bog while hunting on the moor. At this point the reader has no idea that this is a complete fiction. Vera knows the men will soon be returning and that Framton will take them for ghosts. Her aunt plays her part perfectly. She says she is expecting her husband and her two young brothers to be returning for tea and that they will enter through the open French window as they always do. Framton has been set up to believe that Mrs. Sappleton lost her mind when the "tragedy" happened and that she has been expecting her men to return at tea time for the past three years.


Framton is seated in such a way that he can see Mrs. Sappleton but cannot see the open window or Vera. When his hostess says, "Here they are at last!", Framton does not look towards the window because he assumes the woman is just having an hallucination. Instead, he turns to look at Vera to show his sympathy. He is shocked when he sees that the young girl is looking at the window and making a horrified face. So then he looks at the window and sees what he has been set up to see.



In the deepening twilight three figures were walking across the lawn towards the window, they all carried guns under their arms, and one of them was additionally burdened with a white coat hung over his shoulders. A tired brown spaniel kept close at their heels. Noiselessly they neared the house, and then a hoarse young voice chanted out of the dusk: "I said, Bertie, why do you bound?"



Framton's reaction shows that--ironically--he is experiencing, or is about to experience, just exactly the opposite of what all his doctors prescribed: "complete rest, an absence of mental excitement, and avoidance of anything in the nature of violent physical exercise."




Framton grabbed wildly at his stick and hat; the hall door, the gravel drive, and the front gate were dimly noted stages in his headlong retreat. A cyclist coming along the road had to run into the hedge to avoid imminent collision.



The humor in the story is entirely based on the ironic contrast between the peace and quiet that Framton was seeking and the fright of his life he received at the Sappletons which caused him to get the most "violent physical exercise" he had probably ever gotten in his life. The fact that the three "ghosts" were all carrying guns made them all the more frightening.


Monday, January 5, 2009

How is Macbeth presented in a positive way at the beginning of the play?

Macbeth is portrayed as a valiant, honorable Scottish noble at the beginning of the play. The first description we get of the play's title character is given by a sergeant to King Duncan. The sergeant describes a rebellion by Macdonwald, a rebellious nobleman who apparently seeks to overthrow Duncan. Macbeth, a Scottish thane (nobleman), fights his way through the rebel army before slashing Macdonwald "from the nave to the chaps" with his sword and decapitating him. Of course modern readers might be shocked by the violence of this act (which, it might be argued, foreshadows some of the violent deeds Macbeth commits later, in addition to his own demise at the hands of Macduff) but Duncan is impressed by the bravery and loyalty of his kinsman. He calls him a "valiant cousin" and "noble kinsman." Macbeth then leads his forces against an attempted invasion by a "Norweyan lord," again emerging victorious. So Macbeth is respected, even viewed as a hero, by the King and by his peers. This positive portrayal of the man early in the play makes his descent into murder and treachery all the more dramatic.

What makes acidity a factor?

Hydrogen ions, which are protons, determine acidity. Conversely, hydroxide ions (OH-) produce basicity. If an aqueous solution contains more H+ than OH- ions it's acidic, and if it contains more OH- than H+ ions it's basic. And acid and a base neutralize each other because the H+ and OH- ions combine to form water. 


The pH scale is based on the concentration of H+ ions in a solution. pH is the negative logarithm of the H+ concentration. In other words, it's the exponent but with the opposite sign. If a solution has an H+ concentration of 10^(-4), its pH is 4. If it has an H+ concentration of 10^-6, which is lower, it's pH is 6. This explains why lower pH indicates a more acidic solution. An solution with a pH of 7 is neutral because the product of H+ and OH- concentrations in a solution is always 10^(-14), so if the concentration of one is 10^(-7) the other must be the same. If the pH is above 7 the solution will be basic as the OH- concentration exceeds the H+ concentration.


Strong and concentrated acids are corrosive. They react with metals and can cause injury to skin and eyes. Weaker acids are often consumed in foods, for example vinegar and citrus juices. Acids taste sour.


In summary, using brackets to denote concentration,


[H+] > [OH-] = acid


[H+] < [OH-] = base


[H+] = [OH-] = neutral

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Discuss the significance of the title of the novel A TALE OF TWO CITIES.

The title A Tale of Two Cities is literally true as the plot involves action in both London and Paris. However, it is also significant with respect to the motif of dualities in people and in action.


Introducing the motif of dualities, the title of Charles Dickens' historical novel contains the narrative of two families during the French Revolution. There are events that occur involving these two families in both London and Paris; there are different identities of characters in each of the two cities, and there are social conditions that are similar in both of the two capital cities of England and France. In addition, subplots integrate with the main plot in intriguing ways by the end of the narrative, so, in a sense, there are more dualities.


  • Social Conditions

In his opening chapter and first famous lines, Dickens writes of the similarities between England and France within the time period of the setting:



...there were a king with a large jaw and a queen with a plain face on the throne of England; there were a king with a large jaw and a queen with a fair face on the throne of France....



While the flames of revolution in France grow, Dickens notes, the burglaries and highway robberies increase the murdered count in England as the beheaded do in France. "In the midst of them [all the crimes in England], the hangman "was in constant requisition," just as in France, the men working the guillotines were in constant activity.


  • Dual Identities

Charles Darnay, who meets Lucie Manette on her passage to England, is actually Charles Evremonde. He has renounced his aristocratic position and come to England as a tutor. However, he is charged with treason by a dual spy and goes on trial in London. Later, after he is called back to Paris, he again is charged with a crime against the new government and taken to prison as an oppressive aristocrat.


John Basard, whose real name is Solomon Pross, is a scoundrel who works as a double spy.  He testifies against Darnay in Book I, later, he spies in St. Antoine and Paris; then in Book III he is the turnkey where Charles Evremonde/Darnay is imprisoned.


Dr. Manette, the French physician who is captured by the Evremonde brothers is falsely imprisoned in the Bastille. After the storming of the Bastille and the commencement of the Revolution in France, Manette is heralded as the prisoner who survived the aristocratic tyranny.


  • Character Doubles

Dickens also employs character doubles such as Dr. Manette and Mr. Lorry, who are similar. Also, there are opposing doubles such as Madame Lafarge and Lucie Manette/Darnay. While Dickens’s doubling functions to depict oppositions, it sometimes also reveals hidden parallels. For instance, Sydney Carton seems a foil to Charles Darnay in the early part of the novel, but as the narrative progresses, he becomes an even better and more heroic person than Darnay.

What were three qualities that made Odysseus a great leader in The Odyssey and what book did they occur in?

In The Odyssey by Homer, the eponymous hero Odysseus is shown as an exemplary leader in several different scenes and episodes.


The first important leadership characteristic he demonstrates is persistence. He has been away from his home and his wife Penelope for 20 years and still, despite war, temptations, and obstacles persists in his goal of returning home to his wife and his son. He demonstrates this in Book 9, when he refuses to succumb to the allure of the lotus eaters and makes his men continue on their journey.


The next important characteristic of Odysseus his his ability to devise and carry out long term plans, not ruining his schemes by impatience or acting too early. An example of this is the way he manages to escape from Polyphemus, as described in book 9.


For the Greeks, great physical strength and martial prowess were essential characteristics of a leader. Odysseus demonstrates these in Book 23 where he is easily able to string a bow that the suitors cannot use. 

Friday, January 2, 2009

Do you agree or disagree with Thoreau's opinion on civil disobedience?

In 1849, Thoreau, a Transcendentalist writer in Concord, Massachusetts, wrote the essay "Civil Disobedience" (first published as "Resistance to Civil Government") about the right of people to resist following laws they considered unjust. Thoreau had served one night in prison in 1846 for refusing to pay the poll tax to protest American involvement in the Mexican War. He and other abolitionists thought the war was a means of expanding American slavery. He wrote of this time:



"I have paid no poll-tax for six years. I was put into a jail once on this account, for one night; and, as I stood considering the walls of solid stone, two or three feet thick, the door of wood and iron, a foot thick, and the iron grating which strained the light, I could not help being struck with the foolishness of that institution which treated me as if I were mere flesh and blood and bones, to be locked up. I wondered that it should have concluded at length that this was the best use it could put me to, and had never thought to avail itself of my services in some way."



Thoreau's means of protest was peaceful, and he found it ironic that the country should imprison him for following his conscience. He asked, "Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience? — in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable?" In other words, Thoreau envisioned a government in which the majorities only decide issues that need to be taken care of, such as road building, but in which larger issues are left to individual conscience. 


When he wrote this essay, he and others were outraged by the Compromise of 1850, which concluded the Mexican War. One of the terms of the compromise was a new and more forceful Fugitive Slave Law, which required northerners to return escaped slaves to the south and hence to the horrors of slavery. Thoreau felt that slavery was a great evil and that people had to resist it.


When considering whether or not to agree with Thoreau, the reader must decide which issues are important enough to provoke resistance to government laws. In addition, the reader must decide how to protest these laws. Thoreau's means of resistance were peaceful. Thoreau's peaceful resistance inspired later civil rights leaders, such as Gandhi in India and Martin Luther King, Jr. in the United States. 

What is a theme in Seedfolks?

One of the major themes of Seedfolks is that out of something ugly, something beautiful can grow.  This theme is not only seen through the physical growth of the garden but also through the emotional and personal growth of the neighborhood surrounding the garden. Before the first beans were planted, the people in the Gibb St. neighborhood were isolated from each other physically and emotionally.  Their differences kept them apart because they were from various ethnic backgrounds. They just existed together in this urban setting not really knowing each other or caring about each other.


The work done in the community garden by characters like Kim, Leona, Gonzalo, and Tio Juan brings everyone out of isolation in their homes to form friendships built on a common goal. Working towards the success of the garden not only makes their environment beautiful, but it helps grow friendships and understanding. 


So, out of a trash filled vacant lot that surrounds their homes, a new environment of acceptance, compassion, and pride metaphorically “grows” as a theme in Seedfolks.

How do the nucleotides in DNA pair up?

DNA or deoxyribonucleic acid is a double helical molecule, with its two strands connected to each other through nucleotide pairing. There are 4 different nucleotides in a DNA molecule. These include the purines: adenine and guanine, and pyrimidines: thymine and cytosine. These 4 bases are designated by symbols A, G, T and C, respectively. As a rule, adenine (A) always pairs with thymine (T) and guanine (G) always pairs with cytosine (C). It is this pairing of bases that connects the two DNA strands together. These pairing rules are used to determine the base pair sequence of a complementary strand. For example, if one given DNA strand is denoted as GGCAGTTCA, then by using these rules, we know that the complementary strand would be CCGTCAAGT.


Hope this helps. 

What does the reader know that the mother does not know? Explain why the mother's refusal to let her child join a demonstration by sending her to...

The reader may well know that Birmingham, Alabama, was a hotbed of racial tension and the 16th Street Baptist Church was an organizational setting for major players in the movement for racial equality.


The anonymous mother, who represents the six mothers who lost their children in the bombing, must not have realized that the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham was the site of many meetings of the Southern Christian Leadership Council whose local organizer was the pastor in residence, Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth [the Birmingham airport is now named after him]; in addition, James Bevel, SCLC leader who began the Children's Crusade, teaching youth about non-violence, as well as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. were regular speakers at this church. The bombing took place at this church because these men were often present, and the church was viewed as a center for racial protest.


Rather than allowing her child to go into the streets and partake in a racial freedom demonstration, which could, indeed, become dangerous, the mother, ironically, sends her daughter to the church where she believes her girl will be safe. This is an example of dramatic irony since there is a contradiction between what the mother believes (that her girl will be safe) and what the reader knows to be true (the church is not safe).

How does author Elie Wiesel use symbolism to contribute to the meaning of Night?

In his book Night , Elie Wiesel uses symbolism throughout to enhance the text. First of all, the title itself is symbolic. The word "ni...