There are significant differences between traditional hazards such as natural disasters and those hazards associated with terrorism. We now live in a world where we must deal with both kinds of hazards.
One difference is predictability. With most natural disasters, we can predict the likelihood of these disasters occurring. With weather-related events, we have the technology to predict where and when flooding or tornadoes may occur. We even have some scientific knowledge that may help predict where and when an earthquake may occur. With terrorism, it is very hard to predict where and when an incident may occur. The terrorist hazards are ones that could occur anywhere and at any time. Terrorist hazards are much more difficult to predict.
A second difference is in the area of preparedness. We can construct buildings to make them more likely to survive an earthquake. We can practice tornado drills and build tornado shelters. Emergency personnel can practice responding to hazardous material incidents. We can educate people about what to do in case of a traditional hazard. It is much more difficult to prepare for a terrorist incident. Because these incidents can happen at any time and in any place, and because they tend to be very random, it is very hard to practice and prepare for them. While law enforcement personnel may be able to practice for these events, it is much more difficult for the general public to be involved in these drills.
There are significant differences between the traditional hazards we have faced in the past and the newer hazards we now face created by acts of terror.
No comments:
Post a Comment