Friday, November 14, 2014

Is 2003 divisible by 3?

Hello!


No, 2003 isn't divisible by 3. Strictly speaking, there is no such integer that  although such rational number exists.


To prove this, express 2003 as 3*667 + 2, which means the remainder of division of 2003 by 3 is 2. If 2003 would divisible by 3, then


2 = 2003 - 3*667


would be also divisible by 3, which is false.



Also there is a simple divisibility rule: a decimal integer N is divisible by 3 if and only if the sum of digits of N is divisible by 3.


The cause of this rule is that 10 gives the remainder 1 after division by 3. Therefore 100, 1000 and all other powers of 10 give the remainder 1 after division by 3.


In our case 2003 becomes 2+0+0+3=5, which isn't divisible by 3.

No comments:

Post a Comment

How does author Elie Wiesel use symbolism to contribute to the meaning of Night?

In his book Night , Elie Wiesel uses symbolism throughout to enhance the text. First of all, the title itself is symbolic. The word "ni...